Hamlet’s Indecision Essay

hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, is a effulgent young macrocosm with humannessy talents. He is an academic, a witty orator, and a flawless actor. Certainly, he has the potential to do anything he wants which may progress to included, in the future, being the King of Denmark. His aptitude for solely things calls into question wherefore there is a great delay between junctures decision to avenge his fathers murder and the actual revenge. It is crossroadss idealism which leads to indecision and the reevaluation of his choice to kill Claudius. juncture actions should non attributed to work forcetal illness but the purity of his somebody.He believes fully that men were born good and were meant to do good things. His strong belief form contrasts strikingly with the reality and corruption of the arena when he returns home. He comments on the state of Denmark and more specifically his fathers house, Tis an unweeded garden that grows to set out Things rank and gross in nature posse ss it merely (Act I, sc ii). He is disgusted non just by his home confederation but the evil which existed in his family. He finds it difficult to resolve his illusions of what his world was with the reality of the situation.It is his idealist personality which allows him to c at one timeal his bitterness while his indispensable will pressures him to avenge his fathers death. Hamlet attempts to use logic, a typical idealist characteristic, to determine what course of action he must take. Hamlet struggles with idea that he may be a coward for his inaction. At this point in the rook Hamlet does not understand that it is his good that is delaying his revenge. Despite his nightly supernatural chat with the ghost of his murdered father, he is still unsure if justice should be done by his admit hand.Hamlet understands that if Claudius did kill his father he must kill Claudius. He understands that in a world of lies it was hard to evidence truth from fiction, and a sinner from a sai nt. Therefore, Hamlet must have independent conclusion that his uncle murdered his father. A play within a play is the solo way Hamlet, besides direct conformation, is going to be able to tell if Claudius is guilty. It is for this reason that Hamlet invites players in to perform a murderous play to ferret out the truth from his mother and new father.Hamlets in great power to understand the motives of evil in actions and thought can in like manner be attributed to his sole idealistic viewpoint. He does not understand why anyone would commit murder and thence he is uncertain that he had ability to violently kill a man. Murderous revenge represents everything that Hamlet is not. Hamlets rational intellect allowed him the clarity of mind to understand twain the good and bad in the act of the revenge. The mental degradation of Hamlet, is believed to be insanity by the other characters but it was clear to the audience that he is merely coming to terms with what he believes to be righ t.Hamlet is a religious man and murder was a sin. Hamlet is a man of classical philosophy and revenge is not rational. Choosing to appear mentally violate is good strategy because if the characters believe he is unwell, he will not be able to figure out the aline. Hamlets true character remains unblemished. Hamlet is a man who believes in chivalry, and tanning is not gentle. It is those idealistic qualities which causes the postponement of Claudius death. It is in the moment that Hamlet allows his perception to dominate over his intellect that Claudius was killed.He is consumed by the thoughts of his fathers demise and is haunted by the knowledge that his fathers soul will not be able to rest until his death is avenged. Hamlet willfully concludes, My thoughts be bloody or be nothing expense (Act IV sc iv). It is then that Hamlet finally had the ability to abrogate his idealistic nature, and do what is right. The murder is not a well think scheme and occurs in the heat of the moment. Hamlet, after the murder of Claudius never once wavers in his decision. He has done what is right and believes that There is a additional providence in the fall of a sparrow (Act V sc ii).Oddly enough fatalism is part of idealistic theory and therefore Hamlet always remains true to himself and his idealism. Hamlets idealism makes him the meliorate tragic protagonist and leads to theme of indecision. Without his intense regard for the ideals of truth, justice, goodness and bag there would be no play. His fatal flaw, the belief that men and therefore the world are inherently good, created a moral dilemma which the characters, and spot revolves. Even Hamlet, the academic, comments on the presence of hamartia in human nature. He stated oft it chances in exceptional men That for some brutish mole of nature in them,As in their birth, wherein they are not guilty, By the oergrowth of some complexion, Oft breaking down the pales and forts of reason, Their virtues else, be they as pure as grace, As infinite as man may undergo, Shall in the general censure take corruption From that particular fault. (Act 1, sc 4). Hamlet continues late in the resolution of the play, though I am not spleenative and rash Yet have I in me something dangerous (Act V. sc i. ) Hamlets idealistic nature absurd with his pragmatic circumstances, which creates the ultimate theme and driving force behind all the rising action, falling action, and resolution of this tragedy.