Friday, February 22, 2019

Nucor Corporation Case Analysis Essay

1. What atomic build 18 the primary war the homogeneous threads impacting U.S. trade name producers in oecumenical and the producers equal Nucor that commit late firebrand products via recycling oddball brand in percentageicular? Please do a five-forces analysis disceptation among Steel Producers in that respect is a fierce competitive force in this perseverance. Rivalry revolves heavily around price competition beca consumption most firebrand products argon commodities. Producing steel of satisfactory quality is most producers are well-known(prenominal) with. In a commodity market like steel, it is hard to point out products of one steel producer from an early(a). I this type of market condition, buyers make a choice among minusculeest/best price merchandi descryrs.Moreover, competitively, meeting customers lecture schedule requirements is also a relevant conside ration for the buyers. This particularly holds original when rival sellers are charging fierce co mpetitive prices. Nucor is figuring out how to use low- approach scrap steel recycling technology to make a wider and wider range of steel products. Nucor is development its revolutionaryly developed technical capabilities to defer a fierce battle for market share in the new product categories.Competition from SubstitutesA moderately strong competitive force there are substitute products that compete with steel. For instance, aluminum, plastics and other materials arsehole be used in place of steel in some products. The flagellum of EntryA moderately strong competitive force it is little likely that new start-up firms will cipher the steel industry. According to this case, existent steel producers are anxious to give way their full treatment at their in full capacity. It is to a greater extent(prenominal) likely to seek out customers in geographical markets where they do not currently have a presence. Moreover, it is blank that new initiation may occur when companies l ike Nucor and Mittal Steel acquire less made steelproducers and try to turn the operations of the newly acquired companies into strong contenders in the marketplace. Nucors recent acquisitions, for example, re deliver entry of a potent and competitively winnerful steel company into either product categories or geographic areas where its presence is minimal. Similarly, Mittal Steels growth via acquisition strategy has sour it into a major competitive force worldwide. Bargaining Power of SuppliersThere is a moderate competitive force in case of scrap steel suppliers and unionized steel companies but there will be a wispy competitive force otherwise. There is an indication that suppliers are major competitive factors. However, the price of scrap steel is a light upon input for mini-mills and rising scrap prices dissolve put them at a competitive disadvantage. But scrap steel prices appear to be a function of overall market demand- egress conditions rather than a function of the superpower of individual suppliers of scrap steel.Bargaining Power of CustomersA moderate to enervated competitive force when demand is strong and in small give but a potent competitive force when demand is weak and steel suppliers are anxious to win a customers business. The competitive conditions in steel can be sturdy when the supply is spectacularer than demand and that price competition tends to dominate the competitive surroundings because of the commodity-like nature of steel products. 2. What driving forces do you see at clobber in this industry? Are they likely to impact the industrys competitive structure favorably or unfavorably? Three factors shift as driving forces hereA. Technological innovation in steel-making via voltaic arc furnace technology, thin-slab casting, and direct casting of carbon steel that has allowed companies like Nucor to enter product segments formerly dominated by the integrated mills of producers using older, more traditional steel-making technology. This driving force is acting to increase the competitive pressures that mini-mills are putting on the integrated producers. There is an unfavor fit solving from the standpoint of integrated producers but ahighly favorable final progeny from the standpoint of the producers like Nucor that are leading the charge to use new low- toll steel-making technology.B. Steel-making capacity worldwide exceeds the demand for steel, such that companies anxious to melt down their plants at full capacity are seeking to find immaterial customers for their output. and so a number of foreign steel suppliers are merchant vessels some of their output to the U.S. This puts them in a head-to-head competition with internalated steel suppliers. High-cost domestic steel suppliers are the hard hit by imported foreign steel. C. Industry consolidation to a smaller number of larger and more competitively successful steel companies (lead in part by the acquisitions of Mittal Steel and Nucor) i s acting to increase competitive pressures. Aggressive companies like Nucor may be able to acquire efficient plants at stack basement prices and enhance their long-run competitive market lieu. The industry spotter and competitive structure is much brighter for a low-cost producer like Nucor, which, is in a grave monetary position.In other words, gnarly industry conditions do not hit all competitors equally hard. As one of the industrys low-cost producers, Nucor is in good position to gain sales and market share at the outlay of the high-cost producers and those exiting the marketplace. Thus an industrys market environment may be unattractive to some rivals doesnt necessarily mean it is unattractive to all rivals because tough conditions for some may mean attractive opport unit of measurementies for others. 3. How attractive are the prospects for incoming profitability of U.S. steelmakers? Should Nucor consider expanding in this type of industry environment? why or why no t? All the U.S. steelmakers have different prospects for time to come profitability. High-cost steelmakers in the U.S. are in a risky position, earning profits because of short supplies and historically high market prices, but facing a weaker emerging when demand weakens and the market prices for steel products slip.A low-cost producer like Nucor is easy to gain sales and market share at the expense of high-cost producers, although it must certainly fight off low-cost foreign suppliers opting to sell in the U.S. to achieve this result. Hence, we think Nucor should certainly consider expanding its capacity via some(prenominal) additional acquisitions and the construction of new plant capacity. And Nucor should probably be around aggressive in doing so, since it has proven expertise in operating plants expeditiously and profitably. However, many domestic steel producersneed to understand expanding in the present environment unless they have the knowledge and ability to do so. There is a tendency for domestic steel producers to acquire and expand existing steel mills rather than to construct new ones. In doing this, they can reduce price-cutting and overcapacity during excess supply of steel products.4. What type of strategy has Nucor followed? Which of the five generic strategies discussed in Chapter 5 is Nucor employing? Is there any reason to believe that Nucor has achieved a sustainable competitive advantage over many of its steel industry rivals? If so, what type of competitive advantage does Nucor enjoy? Low cost supplier continued plant upgrades, cost reduction, and wideer control over rude(prenominal) material costs. Very clearly, Nucor is pursuing a low-cost lead strategy. such a competitive approach often is the best strategy in a commodity product industry. Nucor has been successful in achieving relatively low mathematical product costs.Nucor builds plants inexpensively and operates them efficiently. Nucors record of profitability during hard generation in the domestic steel industry is clear evidence that it is a low cost provider as compared to other domestic steel producers in the U.S. Nucor has to go far away from domestic competitors. No domestic competitors appear to have costs as low as Nucor. Nucor has a sustainable low-cost advantage over domestic steel producers and that it seems able to hold its own in competing against low-cost foreign steelmakers.5. What are the special policies and operating practices that Nucor has employed to implement and execute its chosen strategy? somewhat of the specific policies and operating practices that Nucor has employed to implement and execute its chosen strategy (in pursuit of low-cost leadership status) include The aggressive implementation of cost-saving technological improvements Nucors incentive compensation system for both plant employees and aged(a) managers Nucors HR practices and policies such as its no-layoff policy and its empowerment of plant employees The co mpanys low-cost culture and operating practices.The companys pursuit of innovative technologies to inter into new market segments The emphasis on decentralized decision-making and a genuinely lean corporate staff. Employees were kept informed about company and division performance. Most all employees were quite advised of the level of profits in their plant or division. Nucor plants were linked electronically to eachothers production schedules, and each plant strived to operate in a just-in-time inventory mode. 6. What specific factors account for why Nucor has been so successful over the olden some(prenominal) decades? Do these factors have more to do with great strategy, great strategy execution, or great leadership? There are several factors that account for Nucors spectacular success over the years 1. Nucors a low-cost leadership strategy.Nucor is an refined example of a company with a winning strategy (a clear reason for the companys success). 2. All of its operating prac tices, policies, and procedures are great competing strategies for Nucor, but it has also implanted and executed those strategies effectively and efficiently. 3. Nucor has had great strategic leadership, especially, in the case of Ken Iverson, Dan DiMicco, and senior executive team is a big reason for the companys success over the long-term. Therefore, Nucor is a standout company in an industry that is highly competitive and profitable. Nucor can be an example of great strategy + great strategy execution = great management 7. What is your assessment of Nucors financial performance the past several years? How strong is the companys financial condition? pecuniary AnalysisAssessment of Nucors financial performance in the past several years and the companys financial strength can be analyzed mainly using Nucors case Exhibits 1, 2, and 3. base on the data on Exhibit 1, the following Compound yearly Growth Rates (CAGR) of Tons Sold for Outside Customers, Total gain Sales, Total Earnin gs Before Tax, and Total Net Earnings are analyzed Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) = (Ending Value / inception Value)(1/n) 1 The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of total loads of steel sold to outside customers from 1970-2006 and 2007-2011 is 13.86% and 13.99% respectively. These figures show that there is an increasing apparent motion in the total amount of steel sold to the outside customers.CAGR in loot sales from 1970-2006 is 17.06% and the discharge sales from 2007-2011 is 18.06% CAGR in earnings before taxes from 1970-2006 is 21.84% and that of from 2007-2011 is 19.05% CAGR in mesh topology earnings from 1970-2006 is 22.74% and that of from 2007-2011 is about 20% The calculated result clearly indicate that Nucor has been able to grow its business very systematically over the past several years from 1970 to 2011 even though there were fluctuations in the total tons ofsteel sold after 2008 as indicated in Exhibit 1 on scallywag C-215.The data in Case Exhibit 2 in dicates that Nucor is in good financial stipulation and that its financial performance has been particularly strong from 2002-2008. Using the financial ratio information provided along with calculations of CAGRs, we can determine the following Nucors remuneration sales grew from $4.8 cardinal in 2002 to $23.7 billion in 2008, a very healthy CAGR of 25.62%. The strong increase is collectable both to rising unit sales volume and rising selling prices per ton (we can see in columns 2 and 3 of Exhibit 1 on page C-215 and also the data in case Exhibit 3 on page C-221). Nucors net earnings grew from $162.1 meg in 2002 to $1.83 billion in 2008 and CAGR of 41.4%. However, the big gains primarily came from 2004-2008 period. Financial RatiosBased on the supra table the cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in 2007, 2008, and 2009 is 81.14%, 82.90%, and 98.62% respectively. The rise in percentage of Nucors cost of goods sold during 2007-2009 is more a reflection of a depressed s ales price for steel products than of costs running out of control. This implies that the rate at which the sales decreased is greater than the rate at which the cost of good sold decreasedbecause in Exhibit 2 both the net sales and cost of goods sold shows a decreasing gallery. However, the net sales decreased by more than 50%, whereas the cost of goods sold decreased by a little less than 50%. Generally, there is from 2007 to 2011, we can conclude that there is a fluctuating trend in the cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales.Likewise, the marketing, administrative, and other expenses as a percentage of net sales has a fluctuating trend due to a fluctuating trend in both net sales and marketing, administrative, and other expenses. Generally, all things considered, Nucor is in very good financial shape. If we look at the balance sheet statement from 2000 to 2006 as a representative of the whole data, Nucors working capital has increased from $821.5 gazillion in 2000 to $3.23 billion in 2006, giving it substantially more gillyflower to conduct business operations and more financial flexibility. The companys current ratio has climbed steadily during the 2000-2006 period as well.When we look at the cash flow statement, Nucors cash flows from operating activities climbed from $820.8 million in 2000 to $2.25 billion in 2006. This implies that Nucors cash flows have been sufficient to administer its annual capital expenditure. As far as Nucors long-term debt is concerned, even though Nucors long-term debt climbed from $460.5 million in 2000 to $922.3 million in 2006, Nucors long-term debt as a percentage of stockholders fair-mindedness dropped from 21.6% to 19.1% the company clearly has the ability to handle the higher level of debt due to acquisition. 8. What issues does Nucor management need to address?To be more financially and competitively successful in the years ahead, Nucor has to address the following issues In Nucors case, we see the foll owing issuesInternational expansion should be strengthened.For example, Work more onvalue added productsExpansion into developing countriesDeveloping strategic aliens with other steel producing companies (Caterpillars) to better strength themselves.Union formation is a pick up to employee rightsRecommendations detain to pursue a low-cost leadership strategyContinue to seek out profitable opportunities to expand the companys production capacity. Expanding into the markets of foreign countries needs to be pursued very carefully and cautiously because of its exclusive access to lower- cost steel-making technologies

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.